Cadre méthodologique pour différencier les méthodes multicritères


  1. Guitouni, A.
  2. Bélanger, M.
  3. Martel, J-M.
Corporate Authors
Defence R&D Canada - Valcartier, Valcartier QUE (CAN);Laval Univ, Quebec QUE (CAN)
Most if not all military decision-making problems are multi-dimensional ones requiring multiple points of view. Multiple criteria decision analysis seems to be an appropriate methodology for solving most of these decision-making problems. Many multiple criteria decision aid methods (MCDA) have appeared in the latest decades. The study of the development of the existing multiple criteria aggregation procedure (MCAP) shows that most of them are ad hoc and are the result of problems encountered during the application of current methods to real cases. These problems stand out from the complexity of structuring real world decision-making situations, dealing with evaluations of various natures and modeling decision-maker(s)’ preferences. Therefore, we propose an approach to help choosing among these methods. In this report, we describe a methodological framework intended to differentiate the various methodologies. This framework is based on a representation of decision-making situations that allow categorizing the methods in different classes of decision aid problems. Furthermore, a set of properties is proposed to distinguish the MCAPs of a same class. An illustration of the application of this framework is also presented.

Il y a un résumé en français ici.

Report Number
DRDC-VALCARTIER-TR-2009-386 — Technical Report
Date of publication
01 Nov 2010
Number of Pages
Electronic Document(PDF)

Permanent link

Document 1 of 1

Date modified: